News

Whittow claims PCC could have stopped publishing of libellous McCann stories

12/01/2012

A national newspaper editor has claimed harm caused by defamatory articles published in his paper could have been prevented if the Press Complaints Commission had stepped in.

Hugh Whittow, editor of the Daily Express, told the Leveson Inquiry press coverage of the McCanns was allowed to "go on and on". He added: “I feel perhaps they should have intervened...everybody had too much leeway".

Whittow said it was one reason behind Northern & Shell’s decision to pull out of the PCC in January 2011. The publishers stopped paying into the commission's fund a month before Hugh Whittow took over as editor.

Robert Jay, counsel to the inquiry, appeared surprised when asking Whittow whether he believed the PCC had let down the Express. He added: "Have you got some better reasons for leaving the PCC?"

Whittow replied: "I don't blame the PCC, I just think in hindsight they might have been able to intervene and perhaps this will reflect in the body that you set up".

Express Newspapers was ordered to pay £550,000 to the McCanns in 2008 after articles were published by group titles, including the Express and the Star, alleging Kate and Gerry McCann were responsible for the death of daughter Madeline.

Friends of the McCanns, with the family when Madeline went missing, received a £375,000 libel payout from the group later that year.

Dawn Neesom, editor of the Daily Star, who gave evidence before Whittow, told the inquiry that running the story was a "risk" and said: "I regret what happened in the McCann case and all I can do is repeat the apology on page one for the hurt and distress we caused them".

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

A year and two days: the story of one complaint to IPSO
Guest blog: Chris Goodall's complaint about fifteen errors in a Daily Mail article took IPSO a year and two days to decide. Here he publishes the full timeline — more than 80 emails, hundreds of hours of work, and one correction.
9/22/26
News
SLAPPs and the press: why the Anti-SLAPP Bill is the wrong answer
The private members Bill promoted by Baroness Stowell and Sir John Whittingdale would apply to any claim touching a matter of public interest, however meritorious and however properly brought. Hacked Off sets out why it would harm victims of press abuse, and why section 40 was the better answer.
9/21/26
News
Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News