
Overview
Actor Sienna Miller was one of the victims of widespread phone hacking and unlawful information gathering by journalists working for parts of the British press.
Her experience became a key part of the evidence presented to the Leveson Inquiry, where she described the scale of intrusion into her private life and the failure of press self-regulation to prevent or address it.
In particular, she has spoken about how The Sun discovered she was in the early stages of a pregnancy through unlawful means, she believes, and how this left her feeling forced to make a decision about her pregnancy before she was ready.
Miller’s case helped expose how illegal practices were treated as routine within some newsrooms, and how victims were left without meaningful protection or redress.
Key facts
Further reading
The following Hacked Off posts provide primary material and context for Sienna Miller’s experience of phone hacking and its significance for press reform:
Phone hacking trial evidence
Systemic context from the hacking trial
Significance of this story
Sienna Miller’s case demonstrated that phone hacking was not a one-off scandal, but a widespread and organised practice enabled by weak oversight and ineffective regulation, supplemented by other unethical and intrusive activities. In other words, the culture was rotten.
Her evidence showed how unlawful press behaviour can become normalised — and how difficult it is for victims to secure accountability, even when wrongdoing is clear.