latest news

The Leveson Inquiry and the BBC
Brian Cathcart considers whether the BBC crisis and George Entwistle's fate hold lessons for Leveson and regulated journalism, responding to press commentary.
11/11/12
News
Cross Party Momentum
Brian Cathcart reports on cross-party agreement on press regulation, following the Prime Minister's Questions exchange and a letter from Conservative MPs and peers.
9/11/12
News
Hacked Off respond to Tory MPs' letter on press regulation in the Guardian
Hacked Off's response to a Guardian letter from 42 senior Conservative MPs backing limited statutory press regulation and rejecting continued self-regulation.
Who is talking about statutory CONTROL of the Press?
Mike Jempson of MediaWise argues that the newspaper industry’s cry of “state control” misrepresents what supporters of independent press regulation are actually asking for.
8/11/12
News
The Guardian hangs up its gloves
Argues that The Guardian has stepped back from its earlier role in exposing phone hacking by opposing independent press regulation.
2/11/12
News
Ten things the press would rather you didn't know
Lists ten facts about press regulation and the Leveson Inquiry that the press would rather the public did not know.
2/11/12
Fact-check
Senior academics reject press industry plans for self-regulation
Twenty-six senior professors write to the Financial Times rejecting the newspaper industry's plans for continued self-regulation.
Tall Tales and Desperate Arguments
Rebuts industry arguments against Leveson reform, including claims that statutory regulation would have prevented Jimmy Savile's exposure.
31/10/12
Fact-check
The FT and the Campaign For No Change
Responds to the Financial Times editorial on Leveson, arguing its position amounts to a campaign for no change in regulation.
30/10/12
Fact-check
Hacked Off welcomes Labour commitment to back Leveson
Hacked Off welcomes Labour's commitment to an independent press regulator underpinned by statute, as announced by Harriet Harman.

Learn more

Explore our case studies and the recurring patterns of press harm we campaign against: