News

HACKED OFF PETITION PASSES 100,000 SIGNATURES

02/12/2012

Hacked Off

At lunchtime on Sunday, Hacked Off’s online petition calling on the main party leaders to implement the Leveson recommendations on press regulation in full passed 100,000 signatures. People continue to sign and the number is climbing so rapidly that this may be Britain's fastest-growing online petition ever.

Professor Brian Cathcart, Director of Hacked Off, said:

This is a powerful indication of the strength of public feeling on Leveson.

We have long known that the public is firmly behind effective, independent regulation of the press, which is what the Leveson Report recommends.

We hope that the Prime Minister, who last Thursday appeared to reject a key part of the recommendations, is listening to the voice of the public, just as he promised he would in his evidence under oath at the Leveson Inquiry.

He also promised to listen to the voices of people who have suffered from press abuses, and they have clearly stated their approval for the Leveson proposals.

The House of Commons debates the Leveson Report tomorrow and Hacked Off is calling on all MPs to stand up to press bullying and propaganda and ensure that self-regulation is guaranteed by law to be independent and effective, as the judge has declared is essential.

There must be no fixes or fudges, and no more last chances for editors and proprietors who have been found guilty by the Leveson Inquiry of causing devastating harm to the lives of innocent people.

Hacked Off has robust procedures in place to ensure that the petition results are not open to abuse. A continuous process of verification is under way and false or repeat signatures, where found, are removed from the total number given on the website. We have uncovered very little evidence of such abuses.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

A year and two days: the story of one complaint to IPSO
Guest blog: Chris Goodall's complaint about fifteen errors in a Daily Mail article took IPSO a year and two days to decide. Here he publishes the full timeline — more than 80 emails, hundreds of hours of work, and one correction.
9/22/26
News
SLAPPs and the press: why the Anti-SLAPP Bill is the wrong answer
The private members Bill promoted by Baroness Stowell and Sir John Whittingdale would apply to any claim touching a matter of public interest, however meritorious and however properly brought. Hacked Off sets out why it would harm victims of press abuse, and why section 40 was the better answer.
9/21/26
News
Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News