News

Kate’s boobs, Harry's bum and the Sun’s daft logic

14/09/2012

Brian Cathcart

by Brian Cathcart‘Oh my God!’ yelps the French magazine Closer, announcing its topless duchess scoop with the warning: ‘The photos which will go around the world’.

What can they make of this at the Sun? It’s just weeks since Rupert Murdoch’s daily published pictures of Prince Harry with his clothes off, telling us that in doing so it was performing a ‘vital’ public service.

It was vital, the paper said, on three grounds:

  • to enable the millions without internet access to see what the rest of us could see online;
  • to fully inform the 'legitimate public debate‘ about Harry’s conduct;
  • because failing to publish under pressure from Buckingham Palace would be a betrayal of the free press.

So far, the Closer pictures have not, to my knowledge, reached the internet except in a scanned and blurry form, but if the magazine’s threat is carried out and they ‘go around the world’, surely the Sun will have no choice but to perform its ‘vital’ public service again.

After all, if the pictures of the duchess were available on the internet, non-net households would again be denied the essential knowledge of what her breasts actually look like. And seeing her breasts would again be essential to inform the legitimate public debate about the circumstances in which the pictures were taken. And the freedom of the press would be no less at stake than it was in the Harry case.

The Sun probably won’t publish, and its predicament exposes something simple: the arguments it uses to justify its actions are mere conveniences. The paper does what it wants and throws in justifications without sincerity and without thinking about them.

It is obvious, in other words, that when the Sun made its case for the Harry pictures it didn’t consider those arguments as general ones, merely as smokescreens that were useful on the day.

Nor, predictably, does the Press Complaints Commission help or oblige the paper to take its ethics seriously. As things stand, the editor of the Sun does what he likes – including clearly breaching the PCC Code – and is accountable to no one.

The conclusion is clear: we need a credible, genuinely effective press regulator that is independent of government and industry alike.

Brian Cathcart is director of Hacked Off. He tweets at @BrianCathcartPhoto from Tom Soper Photography

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

A year and two days: the story of one complaint to IPSO
Guest blog: Chris Goodall's complaint about fifteen errors in a Daily Mail article took IPSO a year and two days to decide. Here he publishes the full timeline — more than 80 emails, hundreds of hours of work, and one correction.
9/22/26
News
SLAPPs and the press: why the Anti-SLAPP Bill is the wrong answer
The private members Bill promoted by Baroness Stowell and Sir John Whittingdale would apply to any claim touching a matter of public interest, however meritorious and however properly brought. Hacked Off sets out why it would harm victims of press abuse, and why section 40 was the better answer.
9/21/26
News
Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News