News

The poll results the Sun didn't want you to know

15/11/2012

Hacked Off

The YouGov Poll commissioned by The Sun, published today on p.6 and headlined "State-run watchdog will gag free press: 75% of Brits see threat to the papers" also found a result less sympathetic to vested interests in the newspaper industry.

Asked to what extent, if at all, would you trust newspapers to set up a fair system of press regulation?Percentage of the public that trust newspapers a lot: 1%Percentage of the public that trust newspapers a fair amount: 26%Percentage of the public that do not trust newspapers a lot or at all: 63%

See the full YouGov poll results here.Responding to the finding, Professor Brian Cathcart, Director of Hacked Off, said:

This is another example of selective and biased reporting of the debate over press regulation that we have seen in most of the national press.

The newspapers are under scrutiny and surely have an obligation to present the facts fully and fairly to their readers.

The finding on trust levels is a damning one, which supports earlier polls showing the public no longer believe they can rely on the press to police itself and want a new regulator, independent of both politicians and the newspaper industry.

To see the results of the Hacked Off, the Media Standards Trust and YouGov poll click here.To see the results of the Carnegie Trust and Demos poll click here.

Hacked Off is funded by supporters, not newspaper owners. Help us take this to Parliament: give £10 a month.

Give £10 a month

Download the full report:

Download report

Queries: campaign@hackinginquiry.org

related Posts

A year and two days: the story of one complaint to IPSO
Guest blog: Chris Goodall's complaint about fifteen errors in a Daily Mail article took IPSO a year and two days to decide. Here he publishes the full timeline — more than 80 emails, hundreds of hours of work, and one correction.
9/22/26
News
SLAPPs and the press: why the Anti-SLAPP Bill is the wrong answer
The private members Bill promoted by Baroness Stowell and Sir John Whittingdale would apply to any claim touching a matter of public interest, however meritorious and however properly brought. Hacked Off sets out why it would harm victims of press abuse, and why section 40 was the better answer.
9/21/26
News
Coverage of Professor Arday was not legitimate: the letter The Times refused to publish
Guest blog: Professor Paul Wragg replies to the letter published in The Times on 25 August defending the press coverage of Professor Jason Arday. The Times declined to publish his reply. We publish it here in full.
8/28/26
News
Defensive, evasive & hypocritical: The press reaction to the death of Jason Arday
The reaction of national newspapers to the death of Professor Jason Arday has exposed a brittle defensiveness at the heart of the press, and a determination to remain outside any meaningful accountability.
8/26/26
News